March 2005 OUR VOICE

graphic - four tulips image

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  • Carynne Arnold (Kingston)
  • Chris Benninger (Chatham)
  • Joyce Bigelow (Sharbot Lake)
  • Linda Conley (Picton)
  • Jan Goatcher (Ottawa)
  • Heather Hufton (Peel)
  • Shelley Lawrence (Oshawa)
  • Sheila Marshall (Timmins)
  • Cheryl Reid (Toronto)
  • Valerie Sadler (Hamilton)
  • Penny Smith-Jensen (Dryden)
  • Denise Tremblay (Iroquois Falls)

OUR STAFF

  • Joan Beaudry—Administrative Assistant
  • Jette Cosburn—Co-Executive Director
  • Joanne Kaattari—Co-Executive Director
  • Robb MacDonald—Project Staff
  • Vicki Trottier—Project Staff

OUR CORE FUNDER

CLO gratefully acknowledges its funder: the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities.

OURVOICE NEWSLETTER

OURVOICE is published three times per year by Community Literacy of Ontario. Research and writing by Jette Cosburn and Joanne Kaattari. Editing and desktop publishing by Joanne Kaattari.

Benefits and Challenges

CLO’s survey also asked community literacy agencies to identify the benefits and challenges of 1-1 and small group programming.

The most commonly identified benefits of1-1 programming:

  • Has the ability to meet individual learner needs
  • Provides a highly supportive, safe, private, non-threatening environment for students
  • Convenient for learners (flexible times and locations)
  • Provides effective support to lower level students
  • Offers individualised attention and support
  • Allows students to move at their own pace
  • Builds self-esteem and confidence
  • Is highly learner-centred

The most commonly identified challenges of1-1 programming:

  • Volunteer recruitment
  • Limited hours of instruction
  • Volunteer coordination
  • Volunteer retention
  • Provides less contact hours
  • Time needed for follow-up and monitoring
  • Tutor training
  • Funding

The most commonly identified benefits of small group programming:

  • Group support, encouragement and assistance
  • Peer group interaction increases a wide variety of skills
  • Peer learning and exposure to varied ideas and opinions
  • Can serve more learners
  • Helpful for transitioning students to future goals
  • Provides more contact hours
  • Group dynamics give energy, confidence and motivation
  • Students can attend for more hours
  • Can develop programming targeted to group needs
  • Provides networking opportunities for students

The most commonly identified challenges of small group programming:

  • Meeting multi-level needs and goals
  • Time needed for preparation and follow-up
  • Paid instructors are usually required
  • Lack of space
  • Group dynamics (personality conflicts, disruptive students)
  • Some students cannot keep up or work in group setting
  • Less individualised support
  • Funding